> The interface, especially "bugit sync", reminds me a little bit of
> git-annex. And the fact that it seems written in pure sh (haven't
> checked for bashims and such, just saw the shebang line) is nice.
I think it's nice that an sh implementation is feasible and works
acceptably. [ And yes, I tried to avoid bashisms, tho my /bin/sh is
a link to bash, so I don't make any promise. ]
But the fact that it's implemented in sh is not really a feature, it's
more a historical accident. It will sooner or later need to be
rewritten in a language where we can actually do string processing.
> I'm just unsure if I'll like the cluttering of the branch namespace.
So far, I've assumed that the Git repository used for the BuGit
database is not shared with other uses (tho the code doesn't seriously
depend on it).
> But that's mostly because I use "git branch -av" not that seldom.
Indeed you don't want to look at BuGit's "git branch -a".
Stefan
_______________________________________________
dist-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://kitenet.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dist-bugs
