On Sep 12, 2002, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can see, gas accepts .include lines in both .S and .s
> files. The case of the extension seems to just control whether gcc
> feeds the file to cpp, which will have no effect on '.include' lines.
Right.
> Therefore presumably distcc should do neither .s nor .S remotely?
> It would probably be strange to have somebody write a .S file which
> had both #include and .include lines in it, but I suppose it might
> happen.
It might, indeed. But then, someone might also have a C file
containing a line such as `asm (".include file")'. /me wonders what
kind of pain should be inflicted upon someone who does this :-)
Nah. The pain of not being able to use distcc would probably be
more than enough as a penance :-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
_______________________________________________
distcc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
