On 24 Sep 2002, "Lavelle, Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea what might be happening ? .. I'm going to have a look into it in
> more detail but I figured you'd know the code and how it's supposed to
> behave a whole lot better !
Hi, Neil,
Kevin Bailey pointed out that it is because of a difference in the
wait4() interface between Solaris and Linux/BSD. If you apply the
attached patch it should be OK. (This will be fixed in 0.12.) If
not, please let me know -- and thanks for including a trace, that
helps a lot.
--
Martin
--- serve.c.~1.65.~ 2002-09-19 14:31:18.000000000 +1000
+++ serve.c 2002-09-30 14:16:48.000000000 +1000
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int dcc_accept_job(int fd)
/* FIXME: wait4() on Solaris can't take pid=-1; we possibly need
* to use pid=0, but that will only catch things in the current
* process group. (Shrug, it's a doomed platform anyhow.) */
- wait_ret = dcc_collect_child(-1, &status, &u_us, &s_us);
+ wait_ret = dcc_collect_child(0, &status, &u_us, &s_us);
if (wait_ret) {
rs_log_error("wait failed; forcing failure status");
status = EXIT_DISTCC_FAILED << 8; /* random failure */
_______________________________________________
distcc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
