On Oct 11, 2002, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10 Oct 2002, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Oct 10, 2002, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > The problem is that in this context distcc incorrectly thinks the .S >> > file is the name of the compiler. >> >> And it couldn't possibly tell otherwise should the .S file be >> executable.
> Actually, it can tell, because it looks like a source file name. Err... So if I name my compilers compile.c and compile.C, distcc will take them as source file names instead of as compiler names? This doesn't sound right to me. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer _______________________________________________ distcc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
