-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 09:21, Martin Pool wrote: > On 14 Nov 2002, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bob: What version of distcc are you running? Does the problem still occur > > with 0.1.3? > > By the way, this is "zero point thirteen", not "zero point one point > three". The de facto standard these days is to interpret version > numbers as a dot-separated list of integers, not a floating point > number. I've taken to reading versions as opaque identifiers.
> (Perhaps it was just a typo; I just mention this because somebody was > confused a while ago.) Don't remember if I read it wrong, or wrote it wrong. I tried to copy it from the release notice. No big deal in any case. Brad - -- http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE91CH9W6pHgIdAuOMRAlQUAJ9Wy1hHhflTZMaeMXE/6eIJM/+h5wCfcXfM p9sIjgEjdgb/eifpa/K5RT0= =wJQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ distcc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
