On 12 Dec 2002, Claes Wallin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:19:12PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation. Does this sound like reasonable advice? > > > > http://distcc.samba.org/manual/html/distcc-2.html#ss2.10 > > Excerpt from link: > > If you build gcc from source, you should use the --program-suffix > > configuration options to cause it to be installed with a name that > > encodes the gcc version and the target platform, such as gcc-3.2 or > > gcc-3.2-arm. > > Wouldn't it be better to use the standard naming for cross-compilers, > i.e along the lines of "i686-linux-gcc-3.2", instead of introducing an > arbitrary naming scheme?
Sure. Is that documented anywhere? -- Martin _______________________________________________ distcc mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
