On 17 Dec 2002, Jean-Eric Cuendet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > PS: BTW, I think that you should change mailman settings so Reply reply > to the list, not to the sender only.
There's a long debate about that. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html I don't want to get into it here. > That is *a lot* of work! It is surprisingly less than you might think. See the thread on this list a couple of months ago where some small performance measures were made. > I think that checksum should always be done, while compression should be > optional. At the moment that's what I think too. > When running with SSH transport, we could be able to use SSH own > compression or not (by a DISTCC_SSH_OPTIONS for example) or distcc own > compression (which should be faster since SSH one is gzip based) I think it is adequate to allow people to turn on or off compression using their .ssh/config file. -- Martin _______________________________________________ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe/change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc
