On 18 Jan 2003, Steve Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As unlikely as it sounds, it is what it is. I quoted the last messages > because they were the ones for the file before the scheduler. grepping > the output of the file showed nothing for "sched".
> If I can figure out what's wrong, I'll see if it fixes the odd printf > problem. The printf warning when building distcc is fixed by just deleting the problematic lines. --- dopt.c.~1.27.~ 2003-01-01 01:20:43.000000000 +1100 +++ dopt.c 2003-01-19 15:04:52.000000000 +1100 @@ -111,9 +111,6 @@ static void distccd_show_usage(void) "Options:\n" " --help explain usage and exit\n" " --version show version and exit\n" -#if 0 -" -n, --tasks NUM number of concurrent connections\n" -#endif " -p, --port PORT TCP port to listen on\n" " -P, --pid-file FILE save daemon process id to file\n" " -N, --nice LEVEL lower priority, 20=most nice\n" -- Martin _______________________________________________ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/distcc Alan Cox, Bdale, hpa, rusty, tridge, greg KH --> http://linux.conf.au/
