On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 19:24, Martin Pool wrote: > OK. How is this better than having the clients check which hosts are > up? > > We already remember which hosts are not working, so clients can share > knowledge and won't waste time trying machines which were recently > seen to be down.
Clients are the distcc binaries you're talking about? How are the down hosts remembered? Like I said before, I lost track of things lately. The last version I tried didn't remember so when a host was down I ended up getting many errors of hosts down and it falling back to localhost instead. How about I go re-familiarize myself with distcc's latest happenings before I utter more bollocks ;) -- Gerard Beekmans http://www.linuxfromscratch.org http://www.beekmansworld.com // Linux Consultant --- OSDN / DevChannel // If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
