On 22 Jan 2004, Daniele Nicolucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem actually lies in the fact that the rendezvous-enabled > (zeroconf) version of distcc modified by Apple is veeery old: > lene:~ jollino$ distcc --version > distcc 2.0.1-zeroconf powerpc-apple-darwin7.0 (protocol 1) (default > port 3632) > built Dec 9 2003 20:54:55 > > I tried to see whether Apple had released back their rendezvous distcc > patch, so that someone would include in newer versions, but it seems > not. Am I wrong?
If you received distcc from Apple, then you according to the GPL they
must either have given you the source as well, or have given you
a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third
party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically
performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy
of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the
terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for
software interchange
Did you? If you got neither of these, Apple are violating the
licence.
--
Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
