Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 08:31:40AM -0500, Benjamin S. Scarlet wrote: > > It seems to me that it _might_ be possible to get more for less by > > hooking distcc into gcc differently, at the expense of not distributing > > the assembly. > > There's a project attempting to do that here: > > http://freshmeat.net/projects/cachecc1/ > > I haven't looked at it at all, so I have no idea how well it works. > (The page says "Beta".)
Well, it is a beta because I published it only a few months ago. It has been working "privately" for about two years. I plan to release a new version of cachecc1 that interfaces with distcc in a few days. > The cachecc1 site appears to be down at the moment, though... Yes. tuxfamily.org has been "hacked" :-( A mirror of the site is available at : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/benoit.poulot-cazajous/cachecc1/ -- Benoit __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
