On 24 Feb 2005, Michelasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:01:59 +1100, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't think this is the problem since gcc is newer in the pc where > > > the distributed compilation fails (3.3.5 vs 3.3.4). Moreover the flag > > > declaration-after-statement is present in both Makefiles in the two > > > pc's, and since it does not cause any problem when building locally, I > > > am starting to suspect this is a bug of the distcc implementation on > > > Gentoo. > > > > Please try compiling a file with that option on both machines. > > Building the linux kernel locally on both machines isn't enough (since > this operation uses the Makefile, and in both Makefiles* that option > is present)? > > *the line in the Makefile is: > # warn about C99 declaration after statement > CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wdeclaration-after-statement,)
No, because that line only switches on if the compiler supports the option. That's what the cc-option macro does. -- Martin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
