On 1/24/06, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like distccd to recognize conditions like that > > (as opposed to a load average of 2 caused by running > > distcc and gcc), and refuse to accept compile jobs. > ... > The thing is that you can have machines which can't afford to > spare any memory but that are not doing any IO at the moment. > This is probably typical of large resident applications.
Most of these will show up on the runqueue, though. I bet a check of /proc/loadavg will catch those more simply than a "see if memory is slow" check. Thanks, though! - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
