chenbokai commented on issue #183: some confusion about lantency
URL: https://github.com/apache/distributedlog/issues/183#issuecomment-328407257
 
 
   Thank you for answer my question.It inspired me that when three bookies run 
in different processing speed may cause that situation,so i check data. 
However, bookies processing speed seem like same and  they are higher than 
bookkeeper_client.Here is the data:
   
       "dlwrite.dl.per_channel_bookie_client.192_168_1_41_3181.ADD_ENTRY" : {
         "count" : 707932,
         "max" : 0.039316404,
         "mean" : 7.294639961089494E-4,
         "min" : 2.75805E-4,
         "p50" : 3.984705E-4,
         "p75" : 4.2659500000000004E-4,
         "p95" : 7.601880999999999E-4,
         "p98" : 8.955364600000001E-4,
         "p99" : 0.01701617963000005,
         "p999" : 0.03927668229400001,
         "stddev" : 0.00278056131831563,
         "m15_rate" : 1891.799670421043,
         "m1_rate" : 1635.4133239140433,
         "m5_rate" : 1752.104374396801,
         "mean_rate" : 1818.8154766734172,
         "duration_units" : "seconds",
         "rate_units" : "calls/second"
       },
       "dlwrite.dl.per_channel_bookie_client.192_168_1_51_3181.ADD_ENTRY" : {
         "count" : 707933,
         "max" : 0.041522023000000005,
         "mean" : 6.320614114785992E-4,
         "min" : 2.9043E-4,
         "p50" : 5.07891E-4,
         "p75" : 5.4467125E-4,
         "p95" : 6.306521E-4,
         "p98" : 8.9673956E-4,
         "p99" : 9.898051300000009E-4,
         "p999" : 0.040984281597000065,
         "stddev" : 0.001659605235734714,
         "m15_rate" : 1891.9023616719758,
         "m1_rate" : 1649.1939141689302,
         "m5_rate" : 1758.0522945453104,
         "mean_rate" : 1819.096539916557,
         "duration_units" : "seconds",
         "rate_units" : "calls/second"
       },
       "dlwrite.dl.per_channel_bookie_client.192_168_1_61_3181.ADD_ENTRY" : {
         "count" : 707933,
         "max" : 0.038555315,
         "mean" : 6.465415389105059E-4,
         "min" : 2.7362800000000004E-4,
         "p50" : 4.183085E-4,
         "p75" : 4.452785E-4,
         "p95" : 6.577250999999996E-4,
         "p98" : 8.975637999999999E-4,
         "p99" : 0.008250984760000094,
         "p999" : 0.03834831407300003,
         "stddev" : 0.0021840395244698825,
         "m15_rate" : 1891.9064686175013,
         "m1_rate" : 1649.062855162423,
         "m5_rate" : 1757.9963518522115,
         "mean_rate" : 1819.0914454770852,
         "duration_units" : "seconds",
         "rate_units" : "calls/second"
       },
       "dlwrite.dl.bookkeeper_client.ADD_ENTRY" : {
         "count" : 707931,
         "max" : 0.013280118,
         "mean" : 5.022563307392996E-4,
         "min" : 3.6949300000000003E-4,
         "p50" : 4.7803300000000005E-4,
         "p75" : 5.090157500000001E-4,
         "p95" : 5.7123375E-4,
         "p98" : 5.973867E-4,
         "p99" : 6.266521E-4,
         "p999" : 0.012919525446000045,
         "stddev" : 4.0124739391973426E-4,
         "m15_rate" : 1891.6915529102328,
         "m1_rate" : 1574.91892387704,
         "m5_rate" : 1726.0401619220734,
         "mean_rate" : 1817.5354915211597,
         "duration_units" : "seconds",
         "rate_units" : "calls/second"
       },
   But i think it maybe a rough conclusion through judging by mean rate. Is 
there possible that situation:
   A(below average) B(below average)  C(above average);then A(below average) 
B(above average)  C(below average) and  in turn. So we can't compare both mean  
rate because bookkeeper_client  is always lower than  per_channel_bookie_client.
   
   By the way,will there be any performance improvements in the future? I am 
very much looking forward to seeing it!
   
   
   
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to