On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:36:18PM -0500, James Antill wrote: > % ./distromatch/distromatch fedora xapian-bindings-python > fedora:xapian-bindings-python debian: > fedora:xapian-bindings-python mandriva:xapian-bindings-python > fedora:xapian-bindings-python suse:
Fixed, by adding regexp to consider installed python modules as "interesting" files (thus relevant for matching packages): $ ./distromatch fedora xapian-bindings-python fedora:xapian-bindings-python debian:python-xapian fedora:xapian-bindings-python mandriva:xapian-bindings-python fedora:xapian-bindings-python suse: > % ./distromatch/distromatch fedora glibc > fedora:glibc debian: > fedora:glibc mandriva:glibc > fedora:glibc suse:glibc Here I fixed the shlib regexp to include libraries in /lib (previously it only considered libraries in /usr/lib): $ ./distromatch fedora glibc fedora:glibc debian:hurd,ia32-libs-core,libc0.1,libc0.1-i386,libc0.3,libc6,libc6-amd64,libc6-i386,libc6-mips64,libc6-mipsn32,libc6-ppc64,libc6-s390x,libc6-sparc64,libc6.1 fedora:glibc mandriva:clauer,glibc,ld.so1 fedora:glibc suse:glibc I hadn't realised Debian has so many glibc packages :) Mandriva shows a couple of false positives I'll need to investigate. Implementing matching of source packages could probably help in this case, by restricting the output to those binary packages generated by matching source packages. Matching source packages may require more input data sources, though. > % ./distromatch/distromatch fedora zsh-html > fedora:zsh-html debian: > fedora:zsh-html mandriva: > fedora:zsh-html suse: Is zsh-html the documentation of zsh, therefore something like http://packages.debian.org/sid/zsh-doc ? > % ./distromatch/distromatch fedora openoffice.org-calc > fedora:openoffice.org-calc > debian:app-install-data,broffice.org,libreoffice-calc,openoffice.org-calc > fedora:openoffice.org-calc mandriva:openoffice.org-calc > fedora:openoffice.org-calc suse: This is hit by the openoffice->libreoffice transition. I'll need to investigate a bit more in the next days. > % ./distromatch/distromatch fedora xpaint > fedora:xpaint debian:app-install-data,kappfinder,xpaint > fedora:xpaint mandriva:kappfinder,libxaw3dxft6,xpaint > fedora:xpaint suse: Restricting matching .desktop files to only those in /usr/share/applications gets rid of some false positives. Not sure about libxaw3dxft6, will have to investigate as well. $ ./distromatch fedora xpaint fedora:xpaint debian:libxaw3dxft6,xpaint fedora:xpaint mandriva:lib64xaw3dxft6,libxaw3dxft6,xpaint fedora:xpaint suse: > % ./distromatch/distromatch fedora openssl > fedora:openssl debian:openssl > fedora:openssl mandriva:libopenssl0.9.8,libopenssl1.0.0,openssl > fedora:openssl suse:compat-openssl097g,libopenssl0_9_8,openssl This now has even more false positives after I've improved library matching: $ ./distromatch fedora openssl fedora:openssl debian:ia32-libs,libssl0.9.8,libssl1.0.0,openssl fedora:openssl mandriva:games-compat,lib64openssl0.9.8,lib64openssl1.0.0,libopenssl0.9.8,libopenssl1.0.0,openssl fedora:openssl suse:compat-openssl097g,libopenssl0_9_8,libopenssl1_0_0,openssl,openssl-doc I need to add more filtering of the results of fuzzy match algorithms. > ...it also doesn't seem to understand multilib. so you can find out that > blah.x86_64 on Fedora is libblah62.x86_64 on SuSE, but you can't find > out that blah.i686 is libblah62-32bit.x86_64. Can you give me an example of a specific value of blah? Anyway, you can pull again from git to get the results of my work of today. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enr...@enricozini.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Distributions mailing list Distributions@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distributions
