Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > If we supported variants like this, we'd very likely use environment-modules > (for end-users) and wrapper scripts to manage the paths (for binaries > shipped in Fedora). Otherwise, the outline looks like something reasonable > from our side. It would be more work for the wxwidgets maintainer, though > so unless the Fedora packagers were having problems caused by this we likely > wouldn't implement something like it.
Looking at your spec file, you don't support STL and ANSI variants. So these problems may appear later. These problems appear, when STL-based and wxcontainer-based binaries appear on a single machine. Well, I did not see project, that depend on STL-enabled wxWidgets yet (and ANSI variant uses a different library names). To build just a wxcontainer variant, you can pick a single spec file, but resulting RPMs will not be compatible until %wx_requires appear (rpm is not smart enough to discriminate between two shared library variants selected by RPATH. -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbra...@suse.cz Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +49 911 7405384547 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ _______________________________________________ Distributions mailing list Distributions@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distributions
