Wolfgang Spraul wrote: > Graeme - > please provide exact information for the libamr license. If it is > 'unknown', it may be 'in the public domain'. All the information I can find points to it being an example implementation as part of a 3gpp specification. Normally 3gpp don't allow non members to use their specifications so I am doubting it is in Public Domain.
But I also can't find useful information on what its license actually is. > For openssl, we should add GnuTLS support. > > Honestly I think both cases do not sound very dramatic to me. > But it's great you keep a watchful eye and help us do the due > diligence :-) Yes this is one solution, I wonder if Holger can estimate the time it would require. Graeme
