On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 08:45 PM 12/4/2005 +0000, John J Lee wrote: [...] > After giving this some thought, it seems to me that there might be a better > way to conceptualize this. Instead of "choose 1 of N" dependencies, why not > allow fallbacks from a requirement? In other words, if you have the [...]
Makes sense to me. [...] >> terribly significant for most users, but they're forced to know about it >> regardless in the current state of affairs. > > I'm not sure why; in this particular situation as described it seems to me > the way to go would be to just require scipy_core, and treat support for > alternative packages as optional. That would inconvenience group #2 only if > they have no intention of ever moving to scipy_core, or if for some reason > they're unable to build or get it for their platform. Yes, you're right -- I just didn't like requiring something not really required, but I guess it's no big deal for pure-Python packages (which Scipy isn't, of course). John _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
