Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 02:49 PM 7/17/2006 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> That's not a bad idea (update setup.cfg on sdist w/ --no-svn- revision). >> Any chance of getting this in setuptools 0.6 or should I >> start adding MANIFEST.in files to the relevant projects? >> > > Okay, it's in the trunk now as of 0.7a1dev-r50702 and 0.6c1dev-r50703. It > even handles date and SVN revision tags correctly, by converting them to a > single --tag-build string and disabling the other tagging options. So if > you just build from an sdist without doing anything special, you get the > exact same version the sdist was built with, regardless of how the version > was originally specified. > I'm glad this is being worked on. But a related issue is still biting me with setuptools 0.6c1 in my stdeb package (which builds debian source packages from unmodified setup.py scripts) :
Any distutils commands using "self.distribution.get_version()" still get tagged (at least with the svn revision), even if they're being built from the sdist-generated .tar.gz package. Not knowing the innards of setuptools very well, one idea would be to add something to the .egg-info built by sdist that tells future runs of setuptools not to add tags. This keeps setup.cfg from getting modified but still has the right effect. There's probably a flaw I haven't thought of, though... Cheers! Andrew _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
