On 10/3/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 02:40 PM 10/3/2006 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote: > >Wouldn't it be easier to just tell them to do "sh > >./setuptools-0.6c4-py2.4.egg" instead of marking it executable first? > > I found the phrasing much more awkward that way, as it led to having to > explain the idea that it's got a shell script in there. It seemed easier > to just dodge the issue. But if you can come up with a phrasing that > works, go for it. >
Does it really require explanation? 2) Run it as a shell script (e.g. ``sh ./setuptools-0.6c4-py2.4.egg``). Setuptools will install itself using the matching version of Python (e.g. ``python2.4``), and will place the ``easy_install`` executable in the default location for installing Python scripts. -bob _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig