On 10/3/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 02:40 PM 10/3/2006 -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> >Wouldn't it be easier to just tell them to do "sh
> >./setuptools-0.6c4-py2.4.egg" instead of marking it executable first?
>
> I found the phrasing much more awkward that way, as it led to having to
> explain the idea that it's got a shell script in there.  It seemed easier
> to just dodge the issue.  But if you can come up with a phrasing that
> works, go for it.
>

Does it really require explanation?

2) Run it as a shell script (e.g. ``sh
./setuptools-0.6c4-py2.4.egg``).  Setuptools will
   install itself using the matching version of Python (e.g.
   ``python2.4``), and will place the ``easy_install`` executable
   in the default location for installing Python scripts.

-bob
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to