Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 10:37 AM 10/23/2007 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote: >> On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 18:15 -0500, Dave Peterson wrote: >> > Stanley A. Klein wrote: >> >> > > Other failures included: >> > > >> > > endo - unpackaged pyc and pyo files (looks like a setup.py issue) >> > > >> > >> > I get rpms built for this just fine. Are you sure you have no local >> changes? >> > >> >> The problem with this one may be a setuptools issue. >> >> The failure in doing the bdist_rpm is on a file endo.py, which is >> identified to setuptools in the setup.py as a script. The file is >> originally in enthought/endo/scripts. The pyc and pyo files get built >> there properly because of the [install] optimize=1 option in setup.cfg. >> However, the INSTALLED_FILES also lists a /usr/bin/endo.py without >> the pyc >> and pyo files. The Fedora rpm system causes those optimization files to >> be built unbeknownst to setuptools, which then causes the installed but >> unpackaged files error. >> >> I tried declaring the pyc and pyo files in the script statement, but at >> that point they don't exist and I got an error to that effect. >> >> There is probably a workaround, like commenting out the scripts >> statement in the setup.py and providing rpm a post-install script to >> copy >> endo.* into /usr/bin. However, it would create separate setup.py files >> for rpm and non-rpm packaging. > > Better still, take off the '.py' on the 'endo' script, and/or use > setuptools' script generation support. > I'll take a stab at switching it to use the setuptools script support.
-- Dave _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
