zooko schrieb:
On Aug 5, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
No... which makes binary eggs unusable on Linux. I feel like there
was something else that made binary packages on a Mac unreliable, but
I can't remember.
Perhaps it was http://bugs.python.org/setuptools/issue19 (Will
setuptools on Mac Python accept fat eggs?).
Yes, that's what I meant. setuptools on Mac OS X 10.5 does not accept
'fat' binary eggs build on 10.4.
Diez. R. Roggisch schrieb:
> Why shouldn't they?
Or can you install all of the following on Leopard?
http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/simplejson-1.9.1-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg
http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2306-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg
http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/PyProtocols-1.0a0dev_r2302-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg
http://files.turbogears.org/eggs/Cheetah-2.0rc8-py2.5-macosx-10.3-fat.egg
Chris
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
