On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM, P.J. Eby <[email protected]> wrote: > At 06:57 AM 2/4/2009 +0100, Greg Landrum wrote: >> >> If I were not using setuputils, I would make sure that I had BASE/bin >> in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and everything would work without problems. >> >> If I explictly add the bin directory from the egg >> (/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/BASE-0.1-py2.5-linux-i686.egg) to >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH things also work, but requiring this level of >> involvement from the user isn't particularly pleasing. >> >> Is there a solution to this problem or is this a use case that doesn't >> fit with setuptools? > > There's an experimental and unsupported solution, if you use setuptools to > build the shared library, and you're on a compatible platform. See the > 'tests/shlib_test' subdirectory of the setuptools SVN trunk for info. (The > necessary code is in the 0.6 branch as well, but the tests are only in the > trunk.)
I'm afraid I'm not using setuptools to build. Does this mean I'm stuck? -greg _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
