On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:20 PM, P.J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > At 08:58 PM 5/6/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >> >> Sorry to post again that mail, but it seems that this is the last >> remaining >> issue for the versionning proposal. >> >> Phillip, could you check my proposal for your development versions of >> postreleases >> use case ? > > Is the code up-to-date with the below?
No, I'll do a branch then with that version > > >> thx >> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > 2009/4/22 P.J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com>: >> >> I don't see how it can manage, e.g. a development version of a >> >> postrelease, >> >> with an SVN rev or date stamp on it. Such versions might not be found >> >> on >> >> PyPI or on RPMs, but would be needed in development. >> > >> > So, instead of having 'dev' and 'post', we would require a third case >> > for "pos+dev" version >> > >> > so (dev|post)N+ could become, ((dev|post)N+)|(postN+devN+) >> > >> > example: >> > >> > 1.0.dev459 < 1.0 < 1.0.post456dev463 < 1.0.post456 < 1.0.post489 >> > >> > >> >> >> >> (Btw, the wiki page pseudo-regex doesn't match what the code actually >> >> parses, either.) >> >> >> > >> > i'll check it thx >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org > > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
