Hi Tim, thanks for the feedback, this has been fixed in r72758
http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Lib/distutils/command/build_ext.py?r1=72593&r2=72758 Regards Tarek On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Tim Golden <[email protected]> wrote: > [coming from a thread on python-win32: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-win32/2009-May/009130.html > ] > > In short: changes to build_ext.py in r72585 caused the pywin32 > packages to stop building correctly. The changes in question > are those which call get_ext_filename with the short form of > the ext.name (without the package prefix). The pywin32 setup.py > expects the fully-qualified name in the get_ext_filename in > its subclass. > > Now I don't know whether this is an incautious change to build_ext > or a false -- altho' historically valid -- assumption on the part > of the pywin32 developers. You can see their code here at line 1119: > > http://pywin32.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pywin32/pywin32/setup.py?revision=1.107&view=markup > > I'm afraid I'm fairly ignorant of the design rationale behind > distutils; I'm hoping someone here has a better idea :) > > Opinions? > > TJG > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
