On 8 Jun, 2009, at 8:16, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Paul Moore<[email protected]> wrote:
2009/6/8 Ronald Oussoren <[email protected]>:
I guess the problem only occurs if "egg_infos" is part of the public
interface. What if module A calls get_egg_infos(), then module B
calls
get_egg_infos(somePath), then module A uses "egg_infos" assuming
that it
still refers to the same set of paths.
Vaguely off-topic, but is it only me that hates the abbreviation
"infos"? It can only realistically be an abbreviation for the word
"informations" - and there's no such word :-(
Mmm, that's my frenglish, Sir ;) (If you see other weird stuff
please let me know)
So I guess "get_egg_info" is the shortest, proper form ?
The thingy we're getting is called an "EggInfo", which would IMHO mean
that "get_egg_infos" is technically the correct name for something
that returns a list of them. I'd interpret the singular form as a
function that returns one EggInfo object.
Disclaimer: I'm not a native english speaker
Ronald
Paul.
--
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
