Hi. On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, P.J. Eby<[email protected]> wrote: > Eh? I encourage the fork. I only don't want it called setuptools. Call it > the People's Republic of Setuptools or something. ;-)
Thank you! Judging by the current vote outcome and the interest of the people actually doing the work on this right now, I think we'll call it Distribute - driven by the Fellowship of the Packaging. There needs to be some silliness involved ;-) > As I said, at least half the patches I get are good. Knowing *which* half > is the part that has tougher qualifications. ;-) Sure. Bug management that only consists of applying well tested and thought out patches wouldn't be any fun. I made my choices of which bugs and patches to accept, as seen from my progress report. Obviously I left out all the hard ones for now. > I don't intend to spend a lot of time on that for the fork, actually, at > least not on an unsolicited basis. I hope we will be able to get some more productive and constructive discussions than the usual heated debates we see on this list. It's good to know that you are in principe willing to share your expertise with us. Thanks, Hanno _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
