At 08:23 AM 7/28/2009 -0600, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
I think it might improve performance a bit. (Yes, that's right -- we haven't done a real measurement of performance, but the few times that people briefly glanced at performance it seemed like zipping the eggs made them slower to load, not faster.)
You're trading startup time for import time, actually. Unzipped eggs force OS level stat calls during importing of every module, whereas zipped eggs force directory reads at startup.
In both cases, the time cost mostly occurs at startup; the difference is in whether you have more imports or more eggs. Each zipped egg adds a one-time performance hit; each unzipped egg adds a smaller -- but *N-times* as often -- performance hit.
So the optimum performance tradeoff depends on how many imports you have *and* how many eggs you have on sys.path. If you have lots of eggs and few imports, unzipped ones will probably be faster. If you have lots of eggs and *lots* of imports, zipped ones will probably be faster.
To really know what the tradeoff is, some actual measurements are needed. (And they need to measure both startup overhead and import overhead.)
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
