On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:13:59 +0200, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think things will look better the day we remove setup.py in favor of > a static metadata file. It's good to see that you have your progressive thinking hat on Tarek but given the history that surrounds setup.py, I suggest that removing "setup.py" is "unrealistic". You're far better off to add the functionality so that setup.py can pick up it's metadata from an external file at runtime. For example, add the ability for setup.py to interact with a new file called, say "setup.xml". To use the metadata, we'd need a function to load the metadata. Which shouldn't be so hard to do. Perphaps, self.loadmetadata() Avoid the temptation to use a heavyweight xml processor. Surely doing this cannot be that hard....? even I would volunteer to help out with this. Tell me how? David _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
