Tarek Ziadé wrote:
If we change the name, I would rather call it [metadata]
which is more explicit than [setup]
Not really... metadata is a generic, meaningless word.
We're talking about setup metadata, so I think [setup] makes more sense.
I think the parallels with setup.py and setup.cfg are also better for
discoverability...
btw, I have a working prototype for the setup.cfg.in template file,
I'll push here when I get home tonite, for feedback
I missed the thread on this... Why is it needed? I generally hate the
idea of having a .in file for a .cfg file. It's a sign that the .cfg
fiel is being used incorrectly...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
