kiorky a écrit :
[] > This may be quite current even if it's not a good habit to have circular > dependencies between distributions. > Imagine that. > > B(0.7) -> A(0.6). > A(0.6) -> B(0.7). > > Can i have the same namespace "ns" shared between the twice distributions with > both the setuptools namespaces implementation (A) and the pkg_util's one (B)? > "Have" mean that i can import ns in both distributions. > > So, if: > * I have old distributions with C code even not declaring they are > relying on > setuptools, installing with the 0.6 code automatically. > * I have entry points and namespaces from 0.7 available to import in > 0.6 and > vice-versa. > > I will see no more objections. > > Another related thing, as i read the pep376 implementation, it may be good and > easy to provide some wrappers to some setuptools very used objects like > WorkingSet or Environment as similary code is already implemented to smoothly > migrate existing code. Must i interprete no response as a global No ? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig -- -- Cordialement, KiOrKY GPG Key FingerPrint: 0x1A1194B7681112AF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
