Lennart Regebro a écrit : > 2009/10/14 kiorky <[email protected]>: >>> This may be quite current even if it's not a good habit to have circular >>> dependencies between distributions. >>> Imagine that. >>> >>> B(0.7) -> A(0.6). >>> A(0.6) -> B(0.7). > > I don't think that's a problem, although I can't see why you would > need it in this case. > >>> Can i have the same namespace "ns" shared between the twice distributions >>> with >>> both the setuptools namespaces implementation (A) and the pkg_util's one >>> (B)? > > I don't see why not, they would work the same way. Possibly the global
That's not what said the PEP (IOW what i had understood of) but yes the "namespace" stuff must be shared among all namespaces implementations. I think it is a primal requirement for integration. And it must also be compatible with previous implementations more than every other points like entry points or installation/environment APÏs. > _namespace_packages dictionary needs to be shared by both setuptools > and the new module, but that can easily be handled by importing it > from setuptools if setuptools is installed. > -- -- Cordialement, KiOrKY GPG Key FingerPrint: 0x1A1194B7681112AF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
