Tarek Ziadé wrote:
A quick scan of http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0345/ shows no sign of
any of the contentious bits of PEP390. What am I missing?
That's the part I have not added yet. Markers are the "sys_platform ==
'win32" things
discussed in PEP 390.
But PEP345 is about the metadata that appears in the installed package, no?
What use is it having conditionals in there at all?
(other than that 386 should be accepted and implemented asap...)
Its implemented, we just need a consensus
<flameware shield ;) >
no consensus would mean that if a minority that have enough supporters
objects the PEP,
and provide an alernative, we would have another round.
</flameware>
What are the current sticking points? I do remember some discussions
surrounding this but didn't see any active threads when I went through
distutils-sig today...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
