On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:19:44 +0000, Floris Bruynooghe <floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > .. improve the PEP 386 > reference implementation for example (I pick that one as I know most > about it from all the PEP proposals currently).
I'm +1 on PEP-386. It makes sense to me. > This is a PEP that should maybe be finished first of the bunch PEP-345 is perphaps more important. More depends on that. I think/hope Guido's post has changed things a little. I agree with those who say everybody should work together to some PEPs closed off and I also agree with the push to offer something that is of a more comparable standard to CPAN. To get to where Guido is asking for, I think there are some gaps in the PEP coverage. So we need to cover those bases also. David _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
