Lennart Regebro wrote:
2009/11/12 David Cournapeau <courn...@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> wrote:
Bitching that distutils needs to be scratched and rewritten is not
going to help. You need to DO it.
Nobody asked you (or anyone else) to do anything. Guido asked a
question, we answered with our rationale.
There is no need to be rude.
It was not my intention to be rude, and I don't believe I was. This
discussion has been ongoing for a long time, and I have just recently
asked questions (which of course has been ignored) about this. This is
a discussion that has been going on for a long time, more than a year,
at least, yet noone who says distutils needs to be scratched and
something else written does something about it.
I've pointed this out repeatedly, and been ignored. Perhaps I used to
strong language this time, but on the other hand, I wasn't ignored
this time.
The discussion is pointless. If you want something better than distutils, do it.
David's working on it:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/numscons
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
