On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 18:22 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Wolodja Wentland
> <wentl...@cl.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:

> > The FHS differentiates between various classes of files and defines
> > proper location for them. We could define platform dependent
> > standard infixes for the following data file classes for distribution
> > foo:
> >
> > * configuration     etc
> > * shared data       usr/share/foo/
> > * readme            usr/share/foo/README        README, TODO, ... could
> >                                                be automatically
> >                                                discovered
> > * examples          usr/share/foo/examples
> > * documentation     usr/share/foo/doc
> > * man files         usr/share/man
> > * variable          var/lib/foo
> > * ...

> One could start from all the autoconf-defined variables such as
> prefix, eprefix, sbindir, bindir, etc... One would need in addition
> some variables for python files (.py, pyc and pyo). Then, each scheme
> would just be different mapping for those variables. For example,
> --user option just means changing prefix to $HOME/.local on linux,
> gobolinux (which as a similar file organization as mac os x) could
> easily package as they do for autoconf packages.
+1


> For data files, the major problems currently in distutils are:
>  -  that you cannot 'tag' the different kind of data files. Tarek
> suggestion of using ('$variable_name', [list of files]) is one way of
> solving this. One could also imagine having an argument to setup per
> type (man_files=(list of files), etc...).
        ^^^^^^^^^
I thought of this as well yesterday and actually like it a lot better.

>   - One should think about defining its own data 'type' as well. For
> example, let's say application MegaBar can be extended through python
> plugins. You may want to add your plugin to MegaBar plugin directory:
> ($megabar_dir, [list of files for megabar plugins]). megabar_dir value
> should be customizable from the build process.

Could you elaborate on this idea please? Do you mean that megabars
plugins are shipped in a different distribution than megabar itself? 

I would like this, because it enables developers to split distributions
into different small distributions that might have different release
cycles, only enhance the program/library in question, ...

-- 
  .''`.     Wolodja Wentland    <wentl...@cl.uni-heidelberg.de> 
 : :'  :    
 `. `'`     4096R/CAF14EFC 
   `-       081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to