On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 05:07:01PM +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Floris Bruynooghe > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is an important point. I tought the aim of PEP 386 was to create > > a version scheme that can represent every version number developers > > want to express, not to create one that allows everyones favourite > > syntax. > > > > Absolutely,
Maybe worth explaining this in the abstract of the motivation of the PEP to focus discussion? Otherwise I reckon chances are pretty high that the syntax flameware will flare up again when this gets proposed on python-dev (or here if there's need for another round). > So If the current proposal works for all cases (e.g. people can > translate their schemes > into PEP 386 one), I am proposing to: [...] +1, I think that's a good approach (+0 on the aliases part though) Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
