On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Zubin Mithra <zubin.mit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While going through the distutils code base i realized that logging > was performed with a "log.py" module similar to the logging module in > stdlib. > > Apparently, it documented that the idea was to replace the current > system using the "logging" module at some point, but it seems that it > has`nt been done. I`ve made the necessary modifications and will > upload to bitbucket tomorrow.
that was planned so yes, great that you have done it ! l'll check your work asap > > I`ll also do the same for distutils so that maybe, its a backport for > distutils? No, distutils is frozen, so this is not necessary > > I had found that this was a pending task by looking through the > code-base; and the task was quite trivial. I feel that it would be > great if distutils2 had a "trac" of some sort where we could have > tickets related to it. > > As distutils2 is not part of the python stdlib as of now, it would be > inappropriate to have those tickets at bugs.python.org , i presume. distutils2 issues are in bugs.python.org as well (there's a disutils2 component) since it's going back in the sdtlib eventually, Regards, Tarek > > Awaiting feedback, > -- > Zubin Mithra > > http://zubin71.wordpress.com > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - distutils-...@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
