On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Reinout van Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/15/2010 06:15 PM, Brad Allen wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Simon de Vlieger<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Luigi, >>> >>> I am not sure if using PyPi for private package distribution (what this >>> equates to) would be >>> a particularly nice idea. This way the PyPi would contain packages which >>> cannot be installed >>> by users of PyPi. >>> >>> Alas, I don't know of any ways distutils can fulfill your request in its >>> current form. >> >> Luigi, you might want to consider setting up a private package server >> instead of using PyPI. Where I work, we publish our eggs internally >> via an Apache server, so we are able to make use of Apache's security >> features (like https, authentication, and IP restriction). This works >> fine with setuptools and buildout, and will probably also work in >> future with the new 'distribute' tools. > > See for an example > http://reinout.vanrees.org/weblog/2010/02/25/sdistmaker-your-own-pypi.html > > Replace 'sdistmaker' there with whatever method you choose for putting your > own eggs online. > > There's an apache snippet in there that shows an easy way to use a private > egg server together with the "real pypi".
A good addition to the hithicker's guide could be to list all the options to build a private PyPI, > > > Reinout > > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
