On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 10, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> Glyph Lefkowitz <[email protected]> writes: >>> On May 9, 2010, at 5:47 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >>> >>>> Having .local here looks like a bug to me. Could you create an issue >>>> with details ? >>> >>> For what it's worth, I have had similar things happen when I had >>> forogtten that I created a ~/.pydistutils.cfg. Have you made sure that >>> there isn't one there? >> >> No, that was it. And I certainly don't remember ever touching or >> creating that file either. Thanks! > > Does distutils have a flag for ignoring ~/.pydistutils.cfg, by the way? I > hit this fairly often and it's always a nasty surprise *right* at the end of > a build process. It would be nice to have all official-release scripts > specify an option that specifically overrides per-user configuration.
Yes, someone provided this patch a while ago and I've added it (it's "--no-user-cfg" in 2.6). We should ask people to run this option to get a pseudo-similar execution context when we track a bug > > _______________________________________________ > Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
