Tres Seaver wrote:
     project://some.project/aconfig.cfg
I'd propose egg://some.dotted.name/config.cfg

I think egg:some.dotted.name#config.cfg would be clearer:  the
"hierarchical" URL form is misleading.

How so? The .cfg could be a file in a folder in the egg, same as a template for bfg...

We could even adopt the
convention that such config files needed to be registered as entry
points under some given section, e.g.:

I don't see what purpose this would serve. I was ancticipating them being just like any other package_resource...

Chris

_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to