On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:53 AM, cool-RR <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:36 AM, P.J. Eby <[email protected]> wrote: > >> At 01:11 AM 5/28/2010 +0200, cool-RR wrote: >> >>> The thing I want the most right now is anyone's opinion of what could >>> possibly go wrong with the scheme that P.J. offered, before I start moving >>> my codebase to it. >>> >> >> It's quite routine. Certainly, few of my PyPI projects have the same >> project and package name. For example, 'Importing' contains the module >> 'peak.util.imports'. >> >> To anyone else listening: If you think of ANYTHING that can go wrong with > this scheme, please speak up. I really like knowing about possible problems > in advance. > > Ram. > Hey, I just want to follow up on this issue: I renamed the package to `garlicsim` as suggested, and everything worked out smoothly with no problems. Thanks for your help! Ram.
_______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
