*puts linguist apprentice hat on* David’s message was saying it was uncontroversial that there was a controversy. So his judgment *was* stated as his own, but there was a parsing ambiguity (is the part after “because” a fact or still the opinion?) that tripped Tarek.
*puts hat off* Regards _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
