On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Gary Poster <gary.pos...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Reinout van Rees wrote:

...

>> The subprocess hack sounds a bit dirty, though. It makes me feel like I'm 
>> working around buildout.
>
> FWIW, It's what buildout does for itself all over the place.  It's also 
> reasonable to my mind if you want to explicitly break through an isolation 
> barrier like this, but I won't argue taste.

Buildout uses subprocess to run setup scripts.  That's pretty much
all.  It runs setups scripts in a subprocess because they are written
expecting to be the main program and could do all sorts of things that
could break buildout if run in process.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to