>>> Doesn't "Framework :: Buildout :: Recipe" already imply "Framework :: >>> Buildout" ? >> >> If it indeed could have meant "Framework :: Buildout :: Extension" >> instead, and if "Framework :: Buildout :: Extension" and >> "Framework :: Buildout :: Recipe" are indeed different things, then: >> no. > > That's not what I meant exactly. What I meant that is you declare a > Trove classifier "A :: B :: C" aren't you implicitly declaring "A :: B" > and "A" as well, so you don't need to specify them separately?
Oops, I read it reverse, sorry. It unfortunately depends on who is interpreting the data. For compatibility, I would err on the safe side and just include the old classifier as well. But you are right; it would be redundant. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
