Jim Fulton wrote: >> To me, this looks as if it was safe to just remove any traces of the >> option, including the buggy implementation. The only downside would be >> that configurations which still use the option would fail silently >> instead of raising the NameError. I don't consider this to be of much >> importance in practice, but before going ahead and removing code, I >> wanted to give people a chance to disagree. Thank you. > > +1 > > Perhaps add a check and raise an error if the option is present.
I've just removed the remains of the option's implementation and added a check that raises a UserError if an extended-by option is still encountered in some buildout section. -- Thomas _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
