On 26 March 2013 10:57, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Ah. The metadata (see [1] for an example) mentions "coverage-2.7" as a > script, as > it was built on 2.7. That shouldn't really be in the metadata - there should > be a > single declaration, which is used by distlib/distil to create version-specific > aliases. > > I've now removed it from the metadata from 3.6, you could try again using > > distil install "coverage (3.6)" > > to make sure you pick up the version I changed.
Yes, now it just installs coverage.exe. (No coverage-3.3.exe? Not that it bothers me, I don't use the version-specific script wrappers anyway). > [1] http://www.red-dove.com/pypi/projects/C/coverage/package-3.6b3.json So distil (or is it distlib?) uses metadata from www.red-dove.com as well as PyPI? That's a bit of a surprise. I presume this is a short-term fix, what's the longer-term plan for getting such metadata onto PyPI? Paul. _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
