On May 15, 2013, at 6:21 AM, "Eric V. Smith" <e...@trueblade.com> wrote:

> On May 15, 2013, at 3:29 AM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On May 15, 2013, at 2:58 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Noah Kantrowitz <n...@coderanger.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> File me as a +1 for this change.  If we absolutely must support unicode 
>>>> package names, we should do the URLs in PyPI in punycode and have pip show 
>>>> a puny-mangled name in a confirmation prompt for anything with non-ascii 
>>>> characters in it. Yes, that does basically remove all reason to use 
>>>> unicode in package names, which is why I think blocking it is a much 
>>>> better idea. [a-zA-Z0-9_.-] is probably the right way to go.
>>> 
>>> Right, I'm also a fan of tightening up the rules for metadata 2.0 and
>>> PyPI in general.
>>> 
>>> Fedora's package naming policy is limited to the characters Noah
>>> suggests, with "+" also allowed:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Common_Character_Set_for_Package_Naming
>>> 
>>> And Debian is also similar, with "+" allowed and "_" excluded:
>>> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Source
>>> 
>>> Given the much higher security risks for distribution commands (over
>>> identifiers in code), I think the conservative approach of following
>>> Fedora & Debian's example is the right way to go here.
>>> 
>>> Anyone want to run a scan over the PyPI package set to see how many
>>> packages would cause problems for a "[a-zA-Z0-9_.-]" only filter?
>> 
>> See my previous email where I did queries against my local DB. It's 225 
>> total projects that wouldn't be allowed.
> 
> Can you send the list of those projects?
> 
> Eric.
> 

Here you go https://gist.github.com/dstufft/5583225 used a Python oneliner and 
the PyPI API so others can reproduce easily if they wish.

-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Distutils-SIG maillist  -  Distutils-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig

Reply via email to