-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/29/2013 10:51 AM, Donald Stufft wrote: > I've personally gotten or seen more complaints over the naming of a > variable in the config file then I have over any changes we've made. > The runner up to that is the fallout from switching to requiring > verified SSL.
The past few months have generated a *lot* of teeth-gnashing / hair-pulling, especially among "downstream" developers (those unlikely to be reading this SIG): - - HTTPS-only PyPY - - Distribute / setuptools merge, e.g. cratering folks who use a distro-managed 'python-distribute' package. - - Pip's new backward-imcompatible "final releases by default". I think we are going to be in a much better place for all that, but let's not deny the pain involved for *everybody* in getting there. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlH2n+EACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6megCeN8V8IN4OT6rWfZg1tw1GtUaO 2jwAoLRXzLyjjMbiLrcfqLG0Ge1NQnMq =7ufm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
