On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 August 2013 00:15, PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > None of these things is wrong. It is *spreading* FUD (and in particular, > doing so cynically to undermine a proposal) that is wrong, and I hope I > didn't do that - I certainly did not intend to and I'm a bit unhappy about > the implication that I might have.
Sorry for the implication; it was not intended. I did not think you had any intent to make other people share your doubts or had any desire to shoot down the proposal. As I said, the real intent of my (clearly, in retrospect, very poorly-worded) side-remark was that I thought 90% of the objections to Nick's proposals were based on fear, uncertainty, and doubt rather than any actual issues with the proposals themselves. _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
